<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Edwin M SarmientoWhy Going Back To The Basics Matters &#8211; Edwin M Sarmiento</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.edwinmsarmiento.com/going-back-to-basics-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.edwinmsarmiento.com</link>
	<description>Intentional Excellence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:00:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">84283043</site>		<item>
		<title>Why Going Back To The Basics Matters</title>
		<link>https://www.edwinmsarmiento.com/going-back-to-basics-matter/</link>
		<comments>https://www.edwinmsarmiento.com/going-back-to-basics-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edwin M Sarmiento</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leadership Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DevTeach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server High Availability and Disaster Recovery]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bassplayerdoc.wordpress.com/?p=761</guid>

				<description><![CDATA[I was thinking of posting this in my non-technical blog but realized that technical professionals will find value in the underlying principles and concepts. When I look at different questions posted on the MSDN and TechNet forums, I notice a common thread. Questions are focused on either &#8220;how to do X?&#8221; or &#8220;what is Y?&#8221; [&#8230;]]]></description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I was thinking of posting this in my <a href="http://bassplayerdocs.wordpress.com">non-technical blog</a> but realized that technical professionals will find value in the underlying principles and concepts.</em></p>
<p>When I look at different questions posted on the <a href="http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/categories">MSDN</a> and <a href="http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/categories">TechNet</a> forums, I notice a common thread. Questions are focused on either &#8220;<em>how to do X?</em>&#8221; or &#8220;<em>what is Y?</em>&#8221; types. Sometimes, I see questions about &#8220;<em>why is Y not working and how do I fix it?</em>&#8221; If you&#8217;ve been to one of my presentations, you may have noticed that I almost always start from the basics and internals. Most people find that boring, especially when the attendees consider themselves as senior technical professionals. But what I learn from the attendees of my presentations is interesting. Almost everyone has found some sort of appreciation of the basics. It&#8217;s the same thing I teach my kids: <strong><a href="http://clicktotweet.com/031gl">Learning the basics is the key to understanding the complex</a>. </strong></p>
<p>I also deal a lot with high availability and disaster recovery stuff. When customers ask me questions about how a certain technology or feature work, I ask them back questions that I know they are already familiar with. Often times, they get confused about my approach until I explain that the complex things can be best explained by going back to the basics. It&#8217;s like learning how to do complex mathematical calculations or reading a financial statement; they are both founded on the basic principles of math that our grade school math teachers taught us. So, when I explain the concepts behind SQL Server AlwaysOn Availability Groups, I go back to the concepts behind failover clustering and database mirroring. Once they understood the concepts behind these two technologies, it becomes easier to discuss more complex architectures like multi-subnet clustering with Availability Groups by going back to the concepts that they already know. I use the same approach when answering questions on the <a href="http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/categories">MSDN</a> and <a href="http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/categories">TechNet</a> forums. So, the next time you&#8217;re faced with a technical challenge, approach the complexity of the problem using the filters of the basics that you already know. You&#8217;ll be surprised that <a href="https://www.edwinmsarmiento.com/driving-in-the-uk/" target="_blank">you actually know a few things</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			

		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.edwinmsarmiento.com/going-back-to-basics-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
				<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">761</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>